Share this article:
Print

The face looks familiar, but can machines match human eyes?

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by DAVID SCHECHTER

WFAA

Posted on July 28, 2010 at 10:43 PM

RICHARDSON — With 56 million travelers coming through Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport each year, keeping tabs on security takes more than eyes; it takes machines that can recognize human faces.

Now, researchers at the University of Texas at Dallas are looking at ways to make machines better at recognizing human faces than humans are.

"It's one possible way to think about improving security in the future," said Alice O'Toole with UT-Dallas Brain and Behavioral Sciences.

Security companies are racing to create effective facial recognition software, or "algorithms."

"The algorithms are not going to get bored, and they're not going to have their attention diverted to something else going on," O'Toole explained.

Her research analyzes facial recognition algorithms to see if they're better than people. They both run through a highly controlled test that includes two faces on the screen — each with neutral expressions — each shot in a different location.

So, which is better: People or machines?

"On average now, the very best algorithms in the world, on the tasks that we looked at today, are better than humans," O’Toole concluded. "Pretty similar, but a little bit better."

Controlled settings are one thing, but the real world is full of variables. In fact, Arkansas, Indiana, Nevada and Virginia all outlaw smiling on driver's license photographs. A smile can trick the algorithms that root out fraud by comparing new photos with existing ones in a state's database.

"When you smile, it changes the relative positions of the eyes, the features, the nose may look a little different because the position of the mouth," O'Toole said. "You see dimples sometimes that weren't there."

In the end, O'Toole finds combining algorithms and people together dramatically improves the effectiveness of facial recognition. The machine quickly presents possible matches from a giant database; then the human can sort through the options to make a match.

Had that kind of system been available on September 11, 2001, O'Toole says it could have helped.

"If you have a good watch list, I think it's certainly a good start," she said.

E-mail dschechter@wfaa.com

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

newswatcher1 said on July 29, 2010 at 2:33 PM

actually this sort of technology has been around for a while..hasnt anyone ever heard of the eye recognition type security for some secure bulidings..also the palm recognition that recognizes everyones unique fingerprints..this is not science fiction nor an interference into a persons life..if you dont remember, people were quite upset when metal detectors first came into being back in the late 60's, early 70's..now those are everywhere, even in schools..its the way of the world and our society..sad to say these things are necessary..

48768919
Flag this comment

carrieg said on July 29, 2010 at 8:53 AM

CREEPY! Big brother is coming!

48727809
Flag this comment