Transcript: Chief David Brown on Dallas officers beating suspect

Print
Email
|

WFAA

Posted on September 15, 2010 at 4:23 PM

Updated Wednesday, Sep 15 at 4:25 PM

Here is the full statement from Dallas Police Chief David Brown delivered to reporters on Wednesday afternoon on the alleged beating of a suspect by Dallas police officers.

"Dallas police investigators will recommend to the Dallas county District Attorney Dallas Police Officer Kevin Ray Randolph, hired 3/4/2009, be charged with Assault M/A, Official Oppression M/A, and Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence F/3; Officer Randolph was terminated today for failing probation.

Dallas police investigators will recommend to the Dallas county District Attorney Dallas Police Officer Paul Gregory Bauer, hired 1/21/2009 be charged with Assault M/A, Official Oppression M/A, and Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence F/3.

Dallas police investigators will recommend to the Dallas county District Attorney Dallas Police Officer Henry Walter Duetsch, hired 7/9/2008, be charged with Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence F/3.

Officers on restricted duty: Police Officer Jeremy James Francis, hired 1/7/2009; Robert James Kamphouse, H/M/22, hired 1/21/2009; and Daniel Stephen Malouf W/M/27, hired 5/14/2008 will remain on desk duty until the Internal Affairs investigation is concluded. Other officers at the scene will be interview as well during the Internal Affairs investigation. In addition, the Federal Bureau of Investigation will conduct a concurrent investigation of this incident.

Every citizen deserves a measure of respect.

As Chief of police for the city of Dallas, I expect citizens to hold me accountable for insuring that Dallas officers treat all citizens with fairness and compassion.

No one is above the laws of this great country and I expect officers observing any of their peers violating the law or the department’s rules to report those violations immediately.

No one incident should define the character, integrity, or leadership of the Dallas Police Department.

The public’s trust and confidence in the Dallas Police Department cannot and will not be compromised by the misconduct of a few officers.

Sir Robert Peel, one of the men known as the Father of Modern policing stated, “the police are the public and the public are the police….”

Peelian principles:

1) The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder.

2) The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon the public approval of police actions.

3) Police must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observation of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public.

4) The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force.

5) Police seek and preserve public favor not by catering to public opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.

6) Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice, and warning is found to be insufficient.

7) Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.

8) Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions, and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary.

9) The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.

Conclusion

I’ve been on the job as chief for five months, I’ve been a member of the police department for 27 years, and I was born and raised in this fine city.

I am appealing to the calmer voices of the community and the police department to examine the evidence in this case, and the department’s investigative thoroughness and transparency.

I want you to consider the importance of the many great relationships the Police department has enjoyed over many years as you are making commentary about this incident today and in the days and weeks ahead.

Thank you"

Print
Email
|